北京外国语大学基础英语2000年(含答案)考研真题考研试题年考研真题考研试题

 您现在的位置: 考博信息网 >> 文章中心 >> 笔记讲义 >> 正文:北京外国语大学基础英语2000年(含答案)考研真题考研试题年考研真题考研试题

新闻资讯
普通文章 上海理工大学各学院博士生导师联系方式
普通文章 上海师范大学2018年录取研究生学费标准
普通文章 北京航空航天大学2002-2016年硕士博士研
普通文章 南开大学张文忠教授简介
普通文章 南开大学阎国栋教授简介
普通文章 南开大学王新新教授简介
普通文章 南开大学王丽丹教授简介
普通文章 南开大学王宏印教授简介
普通文章 南开大学王传英教授简介
普通文章 南开大学苏立昌教授简介
调剂信息
普通文章 北方工业大学机电工程学院自动化系2012
普通文章 华南师大光学、光学工程、材料物理与化
普通文章 关于报考中科院大气物理研究所2012年硕
普通文章 广西中医学院2011年硕士研究生调剂信息
普通文章 广西工学院2011年硕士研究生调剂信息公
普通文章 【广西工学院】2012年考研调剂信息
普通文章 【桂林医学院】2012年考研调剂信息
普通文章 广西艺术学院2012拟接收硕士研究生调剂
普通文章 江西科技师范学院2011年硕士研究生调剂
普通文章 【江西科技师范学院】2012年考研调剂信
考研心路
普通文章 潍坊医学院2018年硕士研究生招生常见问
普通文章 报考中国社会科学院研究生院2018年硕士
普通文章 北京体育大学2018年硕士研究生复试分数
普通文章 长春大学2018年硕士研究生招生指南
普通文章 电子科技大学2018年博士研究生招生考试
普通文章 哈尔滨师范大学2017年硕士研究生报考问
普通文章 2016年四川大学化学专业考研复试试题精
普通文章 谈谈为什么要读研究生
普通文章 湖南大学2017年博士生招生复试和录取
普通文章 2013年四川大学传播学研究考博真题

北京外国语大学基础英语2000年(含答案)考研真题考研试题年考研真题考研试题


        资源大小:0.1-10.0 MB

        资源类型:rar
        发布时间:2018-9-1 5:11:29
        资源评分:★★★
        资源简介:北京外国语大学基础英语2000年(含答案)考研真题考研试题年考研真题考研试题    
        下载流程: 考研真题 点击“考研试卷””下载; 考博真题 点击“考博试卷库” 下载
 
北京外国语大学
2000 年硕士研究生入学试题基础英语试卷
I. Reading Comprehension.(32 分)
1. Read the following article and paraphrase the underlined parts:
The twenty-first century will mark the era of tertiary and lifelong learning for everybody-or
almost everybody. Thus the West Report from Australia, echoing a key theme of the immediately
preceding Dearing Report in the UK① (National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education
[NCIHE], 1997).
The notion of lifelong learning has pervaded higher education around the world as
governments have increasingly come to recognize a link between their education systems and
national economic performance. However, policy relating to the actual making of the link needs
deeper consideration. The development of key skills‟ has been seen in the UK as an important way
in which higher education can contribute to economic development, but it can be argued that to
focus on these skills represents a narrow and insufficient response to what employers-and the
wider interest-really need (see Stephenson‟s [1998] argument for a „capability‟ approach to higher
education and, more broadly, the discussion in part 2 of Barnett [1994]. However the contested
nature of this aspect of higher education might be resolved, current discussions have left relatively
unexplored the broader implications for curricula ② and, in particular, for fist-cycle provision.
In earlier times many took the view that a first degree ③ was a sufficient basis for lifetime
career. The accelerating pace of knowledge development has undermined this conception, and
increasing attention is now being given to the provision of higher degree programs and other
opportunities for professional development. This raises a serious question: what function does the
first degree serve in the context of lifelong learning?
Logically, it makes no sense in today‟s world to try to pack first degree curricula with all the
knowledge, understanding and skills need for the rest of a lifetime. There simply is not the time
available, and anyway curriculum-packing runs the risk of superficiality of learning.④ A first
degree should, if they have not already acquired it, develop in students the ability to learn how to
learn, as well as enhance their subject-specific expertise and other relevant skills. The old saying is
valid here: giving individuals each a fish might feed them for a day, but teaching them the skills of
fishing could feed them for life.
There is a need to think of the first degree in terms of the quality, rater than the quantity, of
students‟ learning, In today‟s world the first degree becomes more of a foundation qualification,
upon which graduates will expect to build during their lives. Some might react by saying that to
make such a shift implies a dilution of academic standards-but the counter is that standards relate
primarily to the quality, and not the quantity, of students‟ learning. ⑤ The reconstrued first
degree need be no intellectual poor relation: academic rigour can be built into curricula of widely
differing focus. The standards may well be different, but they do have to be inferior.
Some reduction in the volume of discipline-specific content will require an adjustment of
thought ⑥-in particular, on the part of employers and professional bodies. The professional
accreditation of some first degree programs is seen by some as an essential condition. However,
there seems no necessary reason for this to be the case-and it might well be to the professions‟
longer-term advantage if first degree curricula were to pay particular attention to developing in
graduates the ability to learn to learn, ⑦ leaving subsequent professional and developmental
 
说明:本站提供的《北京外国语大学基础英语2000年(含答案)考研真题考研试题年考研真题考研试题 》源自权威渠道,为历年考过(被使用过)的真题试卷,除标注有“回忆版”字样的试题外,其余均为原版扫描,权威可靠;回忆版试题由当年参加全国硕士、博士研究生入学考试考生回忆,内容完整。

它是全国研究生入学考试考过的真题试卷,属已解密信息,对于报考相关专业考生来说,统考专业课(业务课)科目考研真题对于专业课的复习是非常重要的,因为通过研究真题除了能了解到什么知识点最重要,考哪些题型之外还能给我们反映出老师出题的难度如何,考试考点及重点范围有哪些,每个知识点的历年出题频率,每个章节的分值比重,各个章节的出题比重,每年都要反复考的知识点等等。考试真题的重要性是任何的习题资料都高,比起网上流行的所谓“复习题笔记讲义”(少数除外,大部分都是以同一资料冠以不同学校名称冒充的资料),真题真实性高、渠道权威、试题原版扫描保证清晰。在考博信息网的考试资料体系中,也是把专业课真题作为最为核心、最为重要的资料提供给大家的。

 

考博咨询QQ 135255883 点击这里给我发消息 考研咨询QQ 33455802 点击这里给我发消息 邮箱:customer_service@kaoboinfo.com
考博信息网 版权所有 © kaoboinfo.com All Rights Reserved